Next, you develop this idea, you end up saying, "Our way of recovery – from below." By and large, you're right, without a creative, grassroots voluntary work will not be created the blossoming of the country. Read additional details here: NY museums . But is small and insignificant role in the capital 'Vitality of the country and in the vitality of its culture? " From time immemorial, the legislature was in capitals. Another thing – the executive power. It is scattered across the country, but were accountable to the capital again. This is something that concerns a single state with its capital city, one people and the sole legislative and executive branches. But all this does not exist currently in Russia. After all Russia is divided (and it was fixed Constitutionally) to the subjects of the federation, more than half of whom are public entities with their national Constitution, the President, the legislative and executive power, in name only subordinate to the Federal government.
Good or bad? For these states themselves in the state it's pretty good: you can dictate their terms to the center, scaring the constant threat of withdrawal from the Federation in the event of failure requirements (a kind of political blackmail), but on the other hand – do not bear any responsibility for the economic, financial, legal and social status of its citizens, referring to his "servile" position, determined by the "center." Resembles the situation when a thief stole a purse itself loudly shouting: "Stop thief!". And yet, given the available in the Russian Federation territorial division of the national (I emphasize – with national) of the Federation, let me quote excerpts from a newspaper article "Central Asian underbelly" on "a democratic government that provides rights and freedoms of its citizens at the level of internationally recognized standards. " I quote: "The originality of democracy in any country should be determined by the mentality of the people, national traditions and customs.
Nicholas Batin to end a five-day war in his article "The U.S. and Russia: What Next?" I, in particular, wrote that Americans do not spit into the well from which, perhaps, will soon have a drink. Had in mind in the unfriendly action against Russia, such as: the expansion of NATO to Russia's borders, the deployment of missile defense bases near by her and other actions that do not take into account Russia's interests. I also wrote that the realities and challenges of the twenty-first century dictate that the vital interests of both countries a completely different style of relations between the two largest countries in the world. Unfortunately, this truth has not yet become apparent to the U.S. political leadership. And striking example of this served as a five-day war in the Caucasus, for which lies entirely in the U.S., armed the Saakashvili regime and coached the Georgian army.
In this regard, one can only marvel and myopia short-sightedness of the current U.S. administration, its inability to calculate the consequences of their actions to integrate the global U.S. interests. Until now, the U.S. ruling elite continues to be guided in the outer policy set of techniques and tools of the Cold War, not realizing that the world has changed dramatically. "Saakashvili, of course, son of a bitch. But he's our son of a bitch. " Does not that resembles something painfully familiar? We have to sadly stated that at the present time, American society and American electoral system is not able to nominate the country's leadership is well trained, bright and talented leaders who are at different stages American history has been quite a lot.
But that's not much joy – there is anxiety. And the question – so what does it mean? .. Although it is possible that the same McCain simply follows trends of sensitive political 'modernization' in America, and reflected his knowledge of the fact that on November 15 New York City at the Center for European history, the city hosted an international conference dedicated to the life and work a famous Jewish scholar Raphael Lemkin – the author of the thesis of 'genocide', which in an attempt to formulate it and show what we should call genocide, he turned just in time for the example of mass murder, massacre and deportations of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey. Lemkin was also a lawyer, educator, linguist, writer, and, most importantly, the tireless advocate of international efforts to prevent genocide. And during the conference, many speakers addressed the facts of the extermination of the Turkish government of Armenian intellectuals and cultural heritage of the Armenians …
Whatever it was, a premonition that even in the U.S., despite the Turkish-Armenian protocols will not neglect the theme of the Armenian Genocide in Armenia right now is mixed with bewilderment and dismay. And no one – not from authorities, or from the opposition – does not undertake any obligation to explain difficult people, what actually happens in this area, which is still one of the official foreign policy priority. Apparently, current politicians have nothing to say? Or just afraid of anything at all to speak, even more so – to comment on the possible turns of U.S. .