Federal Constitution

By  

In context of institucional change in which it occurs negotiation of transference of responsibilities and/or sharing of being able, a paradox can consist. Learn more on the subject from Danny Meyer. The necessity to forge new forms of performance of the educational politics demands that the involved institutions in its implementation acquire a body of information and bureaucratic-administrative knowledge to assume its new functions, what without a doubt, generates a period of tension politics and vacuum in the legal normative set, therefore its rationality does not answer more to the necessities of the daily one, that is, between what this set advocates so that the management of the educational politics functions in another paradigm, and its effective operacionalizao, configures a period of institucional instability that prints unexpected routes to its lines of direction in attempt to breach the strong arraigada culture in its managemental managing agencies and the proper pertaining to school units. In view of that in the City departments of Education it does not have financial an bureaucratic-administrative apparatus, therefore all the normative set age of restricted responsibilities to the state governments, currently occurs a great increase of the administrative and pedagogical incubencies in the cities. This responsibility comes being assumed for the municipal sphere, with the creation of the City councils of Education, which would need some infrastructure of functioning in the implementation of the decentralized politics minimum. Thus I redesign, it institucional of the city departments of education and city councils of education come configuring new forms of management of the educational politics. This does not mean, of course, that it is improbable the event of some reversion of the local expectations, in view of the legacy politician and the possibility of cooptao of agencies, therefore the bureaucratization of the participation of the actors is inevitable. Manipulation of information on the part of some local segments enters some of the main impediments is placed it, some indifference or diffidence in relation to the development of the local power; the negotiation of influences and levels of participation in the main decisions of the municipal administrative sphere. Questions as the tradition inherited politics, the inexistence of able pictures technician and the magnifying of the referring performance to the financing and management of educational resources, as well as the differences in the participation levels them local actors, can deepen of negative form the command relations, stimulating one another centralization, that will discourage the envolvement and the participation in the proposals of local politics. However, the institucional difficulties cannot disfigure the process of democratization and decentralization of social public politics and mainly with respect to the development of a new paradigm that is of solidarity, the cooperation and the partnership, foreseen in the Federal Constitution, the LDB and the Law of the Fundeb. The current picture complains each time more the consolidation of the federative principle, whose main base of sustentation rests in its lesser unit, the city, where currently the participation is stimulated as mechanism of development of the local power.